Figure it out based on what teams you want
If you take the top 10 teams betting 100 you would win a minimum 200
If you eliminate Ohio St and Oklahoma even better
But would you take the field at +200?
| 1060 | Ohio State | +1200 | ||
| 91061 | Oklahoma | +1200 | ||
| 91047 | Michigan | +2500 | ||
| 91066 | Penn State | +2500 | ||
| 91016 | Cincinnati | +3300 | ||
| 91033 | Iowa | +4000 | ||
| 91080 | Texas | +4000 | ||
| 91064 | Oregon | +5000 | ||
| 91067 | Pittsburgh | +6600 | ||
| 91054 | NC State | +7500 | ||
| 91017 | Clemson | +8000 | ||
| 91048 | Michigan State | +8000 | ||
| 91062 | Oklahoma State | +8000 | ||
| 91005 | Arizona State | +10000 | ||
| 91009 | Auburn | +10000 | ||
| 91056 | North Carolina | +10000 | ||
| 91059 | Notre Dame | +10000 | ||
| 91063 | Ole Miss | +10000 | ||
| 91098 | Virginia Tech | +10000 | ||
| 91099 | Wake Forest | +10000 | ||
| 91013 | BYU | +12500 | ||
| 91042 | LSU | +12500 | ||
| 91006 | Arkansas | +15000 | ||
| 91024 | Florida | +15000 | ||
| 91037 | Kentucky | +15000 | ||
| 91018 | Coastal Carolina | +20000 | ||
| 91034 | Iowa State | +20000 | ||
| 91089 | UCLA | +20000 | ||
| 91075 | Stanford Cardinal | +25000 | ||
| 91065 | Oregon State | +30000 | ||
| 91071 | SMU | +30000 | ||
| 91083 | Texas Tech | +30000 | ||
| 91093 | Utah | +30000 | ||
| 91010 | Baylor | +50000 | ||
| 91050 | Mississippi State | +50000 | ||
<tbody class="event" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;">
</tbody><tbody class="event" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;">
</tbody>
<tbody class="event" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;">
</tbody>
It is ridiculous if you look at the ESPN Top 300 for the last 3 years and see the caliber of players that Bama signs every year. Look at top 25, top 50, Bama is dominant there but also, throughout.
A small handful of other teams including GA are up there but then there is a severe drop off for the also rans.
A solid team like, say, Iowa... their RB runs wide, the Bama 5 star corner is bigger, faster, better, and makes the tackle behind the line or scrimmage with the OLB and safety on that side right there, too.
A small handful of other teams including GA are up there but then there is a severe drop off for the also rans.
A solid team like, say, Iowa... their RB runs wide, the Bama 5 star corner is bigger, faster, better, and makes the tackle behind the line or scrimmage with the OLB and safety on that side right there, too.
Neither Alabama nor Georgia is unbeatable. Probably the best two teams but both can be beaten on any given day
Georgia hasn’t really been tested. Teams like Arkansas and Auburn can easily be 8-4 unranked teams in the end
Alabama has looked vulnerable. Good Qb play but not quite the running game or general lineman quality
I’d watch out for a discounted team like Ohio State. Discounted after the Oregon game but starting to figure it out. Kind of like 2014
Georgia hasn’t really been tested. Teams like Arkansas and Auburn can easily be 8-4 unranked teams in the end
Alabama has looked vulnerable. Good Qb play but not quite the running game or general lineman quality
I’d watch out for a discounted team like Ohio State. Discounted after the Oregon game but starting to figure it out. Kind of like 2014
